Alright, alright, I’ll do my duty to our self-replicating overlords!
I’ve been tagged by Splendid Elles, and now also by Metro State Atheists, to do this meme, and since I forgot to do the last one Elles tagged me for I’d better do an extra-special job on this one.
Can You Remember The Day That You Officially Became An Atheist?
Well, there are several answers to this question. Of course, before I was old enough to understand ideas of religion I was an atheist by default. But I need to explain my religious upbringing in order to answer more fully. I was raised as a Reform Jew (my dad is Jewish and my mom is Catholic) and when I was little I went with my dad to synagogue many times. I also attended Hebrew school two days a week for several years, learning Hebrew and stories from the Torah. I’m sure that for some of that time I did actually believe in God and take those stories literally, but by the time I was twelve I felt uncomfortable there, partly because I was starting to not believe.
The specific day that I came out as an atheist I remember very well: since I was almost thirteen, my dad asked me when I wanted to have my bat mitzvah, and that’s when I told him that I didn’t think I should have one because I wasn’t sure I believed in God. My dad, with the help of the rabbi, tried to assure me that it was okay to not believe in God and still be a Jew, but I said that I felt I wouldn’t be true to myself if I went through the motions without really believing. (I didn’t appreciate at the time how great it was that my parents, and even the rabbi, were so open in saying that it’s okay not to believe in God. One of my goals as a fledgeling atheist activist is to help people understand that it’s okay to be an atheist, something that few people ever hear from their parents and religious leaders.) (I also have come to understand that it really is possible to be a Jew and not believe in God. Judaism, more than many other religions, is as much a culture and a heritage as a religious belief, and there are plenty of Jews who consider themselves atheists, humanists, etc. while still following many of the cultural traditions of Judaism. For me I think it’s too late though–I’ve distanced myself so much from Judaism in my mind that I don’t feel any connection to the traditions and the culture.)
Do you remember the day you officially became an agnostic?
No, and it definitely wasn’t a single day. I had been calling myself an atheist for several years when I first heard the term “agnostic”, and at that point I considered the words “atheist” and “agnostic” to be different positions on the spectrum of belief. Of course no one but an idiot would claim to have complete knowledge and to know absolutely that no gods exist, but nevertheless I distinguished my position from that of an agnostic by calling myself a “practical atheist”. I reasoned (and still do) that although we can’t know with absolute certainty, we don’t need absolute certainty for all practical purposes. In the face of the utter lack of evidence for gods, our complete failure to find such evidence in any sufficiently rigorous test, and the simplicity and plausibility of other explanations for both events previously attributed to gods and for the existence of religion itself, I am as sure of the nonexistence of any god as a rational person can be. I am as sure that there are no gods as I am that the sun will rise tomorrow, and for much the same reason. This reasoning is shared by many self-described atheists all over the world, including Richard Dawkins and the late Douglas Adams, both of whom have written similarly on the subject.
I probably first heard the word “agnostic” in ninth grade, when I first started getting into religious discussions with friends. I chose to make a distinction between my position and agnosticism as it was first defined to me–in the middle of the spectrum, not leaning toward either side but claiming “I don’t know”–for the reason discussed above. I felt that the word “atheist” is too useful and descriptive a term to waste it on the few silly people who claim absolute certainty, and a much better description of my position than “agnostic”. Since that time, however, I’ve read a number of essays on the subject that have convinced me that the terms “atheist” and “agnostic” are much better defined as describing two different but related qualities, rather than mutually exclusive positions along a spectrum. The words “theist” and “atheist” specifically refer to belief or nonbelief in a deity–either you do have a positive belief in a deity, in which case you’re a theist, or you don’t have a positive belief, in which case you’re an atheist. It’s also possible to have a positive belief in a lack of a deity, in which case you’re still an atheist since you can’t consistently also believe in a deity. By this definition, I am an atheist, as are Dawkins, Adams, etc., along with a lot of people who prefer to call themselves agnostics. But the terms “gnostic” and “agnostic” are referring to something different: a state of knowledge. You can be gnostic, in which case you claim to know that there is a god or that there is no god, or you can be agnostic, meaning that you don’t claim certain knowledge either way. In this sense nearly all self-described atheists, myself included, are agnostic because we don’t claim absolute knowledge. So more specifically I am an agnostic atheist, although I refer to my position primarily as just “atheist”, and I have been ever since I became an atheist.
How about the last time you spoke or prayed to God with actual thought that someone was listening?
Hmmm…the only time I can remember is once at a Yom Kippur service when I was pretty young. I was a pretty sensitive kid and a prime target for the teasing of my schoolmates, and at that age I was really affected by it. So during the service when the rabbi asked us to bow our heads and pray silently, I begged God to please, please make them stop making fun of me. (In case you’re wondering whether the prayer worked, I’d say not. Eventually, the teasing died off, but not until high school and it’s pretty clear that that should be attributed to a combination of all of us growing up and my own growing sense of self-worth and attitude of “their opinions aren’t the ones that matter to me”.)
Did anger towards God or religion help cause you to be an atheist or agnostic?
Nope, most certainly not. I think it was more that I never had a really strong belief, and so I drifted more and more into the default position of not believing unless I could find evidence for a god. On the other hand, once I was more sure of my nonbelief I spent several years as a very belligerent atheist, wanting to pick fights and get into religious debates with anyone I could. (I still do, but I try to limit myself to circumstances where it’s appropriate.)
Here is a good one: Were you agnostic towards ghosts, even after you became an atheist?
I don’t think I ever believed in ghosts, except maybe when I was very little. For a long time I was hopeful, to the point of almost believing, about magic in general though. I have always been interested in fantasy stories, mythology, unicorns, dragons, talking animals and so on, and I sure spent a lot of time hoping any of that could be true. But for the most part I recognized magic as a really fun thing to imagine and read about but not at all supported by any real evidence.
Do you want to be wrong?
Do I want to be wrong? Sure, about lots of things. I’d like to be wrong about how much money I have in the bank, by about a million dollars. I’d like to be wrong about the fact that I probably won’t be the one to solve P=NP (which would also make me wrong about the million dollars). But about religion? Nah, not really. If I am wrong I’d certainly accept it, but I do pretty much think we’re better off without deities, just like we’re better off without kings, or anyone else who gets our deference and respect without earning it just because they’re bigger than us or have certain ancestors. The idea of a god who created us and watches over us seems degrading to me–are we just playthings made by a bored deity who treats us like children? How much better to know that this is not the case, that out of a nonconscious, meaningless universe, we humans have arisen with our consciousness, our ability to create meaning, and our ability to examine ourselves and the universe around us, with no help from anyone but each other!
Okay, the problem with these memes is that I don’t really like tagging that much, but I’ll do it anyway. How about Skeptic’s Play, Perky Skeptic, and Elliptica? No obligation of course, and if anyone else wants to do it, consider yourself tagged!
There’s an extra layer of subtlety to the “agnostic” label. Yes, it’s commonly used to indicate this watered-down “I don’t know” position. But the stronger form makes a positive assertion that it is impossible to “know” — that “knowledge” regarding the divine is impossible.
I’ll add these words from an essay by Penn Jillette.
“Believing there’s no God means I can’t really be forgiven except by kindness and faulty memories. That’s good; it makes me want to be more thoughtful. I have to try to treat people right the first time around.”
John
Eeee, tagged!
Sure, I’ll play! Good, thoughtful answers, by the way! I enjoyed reading this! (Also, gah, thanks for reminding me about Splendid Elles– I keep meaning to add her to my blogroll and forgetting!)
Ooh, this could be interesting. A lot of the questions aren’t geared towards a lifelong atheist like me, but I suspect the answers will be interesting all the same. And sure, I’ll take part.
I just ran across this picture. In particular, it includes some references to the a/gnostic definition fights.
I’ll have it up later this week. I’m not fond of memes, but I do like an excuse to talk about myself, so it’s all good.
No pressure, miller, I just picked you because I figured you’d be reading and potentially interested.
John, that picture is awesome. And yes, you’re right about the potential stronger version of agnosticism. But this post was too long already!
Susan, always good to hear about others who have similar stories to mine (though I didn’t really get the Hebrew school thing when I was a kid, and I’m in the ‘atheist Jew’ camp these days).
Also, good point on the fact that atheism/theism and agnosticism/gnosticism are different continua. It drives me nuts when people attempt to consider them as all being on the same spectrum.
[...] The Unitarian Jihad I ran into this manifesto somewhere, and it reminded me of Terry Tao’s call for reasoned discussion, as well as Susan’s atheism post. [...]
Ping!
http://skepticsplay.blogspot.com/2008/10/deconversion-meme.html
How do you tag another blog?
You have to pray really hard, and if you’re lucky (or God is feeling bored) the person you want to tag will feel this sudden urge to participate in internet memes.
No, actually you just pick someone who you know reads your blog and state that you’re tagging them. Hopefully they’re paying attention and will spring into action! (This is one reason I don’t like to tag in general (besides the fact that I don’t want to make someone feel obligated)–I read a lot of atheist blogs, but there are very few atheist bloggers reading mine!)
Thanks. I kept seeing this and I was baffled. Not many atheist bloggers reading—does that mean math and atheism don’t go together?
While I’d like to think mathematicians, being rational thinkers, would be mostly atheists, that’s certainly not true in practice. More significantly for these purposes, I haven’t seen a lot of blogs that focus a lot on both topics (with some exceptions). But the real reason I say I don’t have a lot of atheist readers is because I don’t have a lot of readers, period. Most of those who do read (that I’m aware of) are skeptics or mathematicians.
My understanding is that, compared to actual scientists, mathematicians are more theistic. Something like in the National Academy of Sciences, 15% of mathematicians are theists, which is the most, ranging down to 5% of biologists. Sadly, I can’t give a citation, I just remember reading this somewhere. Anyone else see it and remember where?
@John Armstrong
Interestingly enough, that stronger definition of agnosticism also allows for one to be an Agnostic theist (this is how I would consider myself – I would make the assertion that knowledge regarding the divine is impossible, but I don’t “know” that God exists, I “believe” that God exists).
I think the even stronger version of agnosticism (thus making three levels of agnosticism
) is best described using the following definition I found with the help of Google:
“A word first used by Professor Huxley, to indicate one who believes nothing which cannot be demonstrated by the senses.”
The above definition specifically does not mention belief in the non-existence of God, as that is just as undemonstrable as belief in God (through the senses – or at least current levels of science).
Indeed, one could well be an agnostic theist. In fact, it’s not wholly incompatible with mainstream Catholic dogma, either. “The existence (or not) of God cannot be reasoned out. But I have faith in His existence.”
Thanks to ebonmuse, you may acquire some new readers. I arrived here via ebonmuse referencing Lynet, who referenced you as a tag. Since tagging is the game, I will play
Can You Remember The Day That You Officially Became An Atheist?
– Yes. At sixteen. Almost 50 years ago.
Do you remember the day you officially became an agnostic?
–No. But I thought the church folks I grew up with were irrational.
How about the last time you spoke or prayed to God with actual thought that someone was listening?
– When I was sixteen, and decided no one was listening.
Did anger towards God or religion help cause you to be an atheist or agnostic?
– No. Just irrational adults.
Here is a good one: Were you agnostic towards ghosts, even after you became an atheist?
– Yes. I gave up Santa Claus early. And the rest was easy. Although I do enjoy science fiction.
Do you want to be wrong?
– No. Rationality is too important.